|
Join the AAF Cartographer: Vlaskovic Historian: Artstotszka Guardian: Freechrist |
 Founded: January 20th, 2016 Motto:Where Dreams Become Story. We prefer a small closely-knit active community, than that of a large inactive loose-knit community |
The regional roleplays now can be found on the region's Regional Roleplay Dispatch that's pinned onto the WFE. |
| Welcome to Audaxia. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Military Factbooks Please | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Mar 22 2016, 10:30 PM (78 Views) | |
| UnitedMoreland | Mar 22 2016, 10:30 PM Post #1 |
|
I posted on this a while back and it turned into a chat about using complex systems to work out militaries and never truly got resolved. Here is my concerns 1. We have a lot of war based RP going on, that's fine as war RP is consensual and if that floats your boat fair enough. However while trying to keep up with stuff about a War RP on the IRC channel I've found it very difficult to find even basic information about many nations military. Now as I stated before I'm not expecting everyone to have as detailed a military factbook as what I've made (I've also done several other users) . However when we can't even find out sizes of armies, general types of kits etc then there is an issue. Having a general idea about size and standards of military has impacts on many other aspects of RP, so for example which direction to take a situation with another nation. I would like to politely ask all nations to have somewhere a factbook entry that at least states the size of the armed forces and some kind of comment at the least on standard. There is nothing worse than someone suddenly pulling ultra modern aircraft carriers out of thin air and saying "Yeah we've had them all along" when you know full well you wouldn't have made that decision. 2. There are some of you out there who use NS for your factbooks and it gets confusing as there is stuff there that is out of date, irrelevant as Future Tech etc. Can we all make it clear which factbook we're using please, perhaps adding it into your signature on the forum here as a link would be useful. |
 |
 
|
| Sad-States | Mar 22 2016, 10:48 PM Post #2 |
Key Keeper
|
My military factbook is already in my sig, so that's a good call for Malson and I. |
|
|
|
| Hawkwick | Mar 23 2016, 05:38 PM Post #3 |
Co-Keeper
|
Added to my signature |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Archive · Next Topic » |
11:30 AM Jul 13